Phidias Propfirm Review 2026

At a Glance: The Four Scores

Scores recompute automatically whenever this firm's data changes.

Pros and Cons

Strategic Edge Plays

1. Swing traders: Premium is one of the only eval families on our futures roster that allows both overnight and over-weekend holds, and its split climbs to 100 percent - if you hold runners, this family is the reason Phidias is on your list at all
2. Speed-to-live seekers: E2L's zero-min-days static design plus the automatic Switch to Live makes it a remarkably short published route to a real brokerage account - just size your expectations to the LIVE credit, because that credit IS your entire live risk budget
3. Pay-path buyers: the one-time payment path zeroes the activation fee by construction and usually carries the deeper published cut, so decide your path before you shop codes - the path decision and the discount decision are the same decision, and the live details are on our Phidias discount page
4. Eyes-open buyers only: while the Trustpilot suspension stands, every trust claim rests on the firm's own word - if third-party validation matters to you, wait for the post-purge recalculated rating before you buy

Verdict and Who It Is For

Phidias prints a 4.6 rating on its own homepage, complete with testimonial cards wearing Trustpilot 5.0 badges. Trustpilot removed reviews it identified as fake, held the rating back for several weeks, and published a recalculated 3.4 on August 2, 2026. As of our September 8, 2026 check the rating is unavailable again: the profile displays a Warning label, states that the rating is unavailable due to a breach of Trustpilot's guidelines, and carries a notice that Trustpilot has removed a number of fake reviews for this company. That gap between what the firm says about itself and what you can actually verify is this whole review in miniature, because Phidias is really two firms depending on which side of that line you stand on.

On the checkable side, the product is genuinely good and unusually easy to read. The rules live on a real one-page public rulebook with per-family grids, published before you pay and kept current. Express to Live is a remarkably short published route from an evaluation to a live brokerage account: a static drawdown that never trails, zero minimum trading days at any stage, no consistency rule, and a first funded payout that converts the account straight to live money clearing through Dorman Trading, a registered FCM. Premium is a true swing family with overnight and weekend holds, which barely exists anywhere else on this roster. News trading is allowed everywhere, no account carries a daily loss limit, and there are no time limits.

On the unverifiable side sits everything the firm claims about itself: the zero-denied-payouts line, the 15 million paid, a funded-trader count that reads 50,000-plus on one of its own pages and 25,000-plus on another. None of it has a proof page behind it, and the one independent scoreboard that could carry some of the weight is unavailable again while Trustpilot reviews the profile. That is why Phidias holds our reported and unverified payout-proof tier rather than the stronger community-aggregated one, and why the trust axis drags the scorecard above while the rules and product side holds it up.

Two profiles get the most out of Phidias. The swing trader, first and clearly, because Premium is one of the only places on our futures roster where holding overnight and through the weekend is simply allowed, with a split that climbs to 100 percent. Second, the disciplined trader who wants a real live account fast and can operate inside a tight static floor, because nothing else on our roster publishes a shorter sim-to-live path than E2L. It is the wrong firm for anyone who needs third-party validation before sending money, because right now there is none and the honest move is to say so. It is the wrong firm for anyone who averages down or trades loose stops, because the static floors are tight and the funded consistency gate on Fundamental and Premium will hold your payout. And it is the wrong firm for anyone reading the fast live path as free money, because the LIVE account you convert into carries a risk budget equal to your accumulated credit and nothing more.

Pricing and Account Tiers

Phidias sorts its whole catalog by how long you plan to hold, and that is the right first question to answer before you look at a single price. Express to Live is the intraday family for precise risk: static drawdown, four sizes from 25K to 150K, flat before the session close. Fundamental is intraday with an end-of-day trailing drawdown across 50K, 100K, and 150K, and it carries the strictest entry gate at three minimum trading days. Premium is the swing family, the rebuilt version of the old Swing accounts: the same three sizes, end-of-day trailing, a one-day eval minimum, and the only place in the catalog where overnight and over-weekend holds are allowed. Ten tiers total, every one of them a single-phase evaluation, plus a separate 10K Drawdown Challenge card that is a competition product rather than an eval, so we exclude it from the Cost Score inputs.

Every family sells on two pay paths, and the difference is structural. The Evaluation or monthly path carries a lower upfront fee plus a one-time Lifetime activation fee when you pass, 83 dollars on the 25K and 149 to 169 above it. The One-Time Payment path is a single payment with the activation fee at zero by construction. Express to Live is one-time only either way and sells no resets at all, so a failed E2L eval means buying a new account. Fundamental and Premium monthly subscriptions bill until you cancel, include a 30-day automatic reset after a failed eval, and sell paid resets at 40, 64, and 104 dollars by size. Premium adds one unusual item: a funded-stage Cash Account Reset at 399 to 599 by size, one per account, and you have 24 hours from liquidation to buy it or the account is gone.

Two more line items before checkout. CME top-of-book data is free on the eval, but market depth is a paid add-on per exchange, and prices are quoted ex-VAT, so EU buyers see tax added at the pay step that the marketing pages never mention. You also pick your platform on the same configurator: Rithmic, Tradovate, or DeepCharts as of our July 7 walk, with TradingView and NinjaTrader routing through Tradovate. The standard undiscounted figures are all in the table below. One reading note: the size on the label is simulated buying power, not a measure of what your fee buys.

Cost in Practice and Live Discounts

Which pay path you buy on moves your real cost at Phidias more than any code ever will. The One-Time Payment path carries the deeper published discount and zeroes the activation fee by construction, while the Evaluation and monthly paths take a shallower cut and still owe activation at passing, so the one-time path is the default rational purchase for most buyers here. On top of that split sits a code layer that churns fast: the pre-applied code chip on the configurator rotated between our two site walks four days apart, and it had already rotated once within a single day before that. The firm runs an evergreen giveaway popup that hands a code to every email it captures, prints another code on its own homepage card, and as of early July its own free-account page still carried a superseded code from a prior cycle. Because some promotion is always displayed, the list prices in the table above are the struck figures rather than a price anyone pays, so treat them as nominal. So the Cost Score here is figured from the level Phidias actually sustains rather than the sticker. Our own Phidias code applies whatever promotion the firm is running at the time on every product, and the current depth by path lives on our Phidias discount page, so make sure you check it before you pick a path, because the path decision and the discount decision are the same decision.

Rules and Risk Mechanics

Five hundred dollars. That is the entire drawdown under the 25K Express to Live account, 2 percent of the label, and it is static, so it never moves: start at 25,000, liquidate at 24,500, eval and funded alike. The 150K version gives you 1,000 of room, two-thirds of one percent. That is the trade E2L offers, a floor that never chases your equity higher in exchange for a floor that starts painfully close, and it is why this family rewards tight, planned risk and punishes anyone who averages down. Fundamental and Premium run an end-of-day trailing drawdown instead, and as trailing goes it is the friendly kind: it only recalculates at the close, and once you are funded it stops trailing entirely at your starting balance plus 100, where it becomes a static floor for the life of the account. No account in the catalog carries a daily loss limit or a time limit.

Minimum days run per family, zero on E2L, one on Premium, three on Fundamental, with one honest caveat: the member portal reportedly prints a blanket three-day minimum, and a dated reviewer reports hitting target on day two of a zero-minimum account and being held to a three-day gate anyway. Until Phidias confirms the enforced values in writing, plan around the possibility that three days is the real gate everywhere. There is no consistency rule on any evaluation. Funded CASH accounts on Fundamental and Premium carry a 30 percent rule calculated over a minimum of four days, and it is a payout gate, not a breach: an oversized day just means growing your total profit until the ratio complies. E2L skips consistency at every stage.

The conduct rules are where Phidias shows its teeth, so read them before you size up. Bots, fully automated algos, and HFT are banned at every stage; semi-automated software is allowed only with a human actively monitoring and adjusting. News trading is allowed everywhere, which is genuinely permissive, but the firm's Foreword reserves the right to strip positions or close accounts over gambling-style behavior like full-margin news punts and one-shot withdrawal plays. Cross-account hedging is the rule with the sharpest edge: long in one account and short in another on the same asset, alone or coordinated with another trader, means closure and confiscation for BOTH parties plus a site ban. You must trade the front month, calendar spreads between maturities are banned, and one-tick Treasury-bond arbitrage is banned by name. Fundamental accounts must be flat by the session close on a published clock, Premium is exempt, and account limits are enforced per tax household, address, and internet connection, not per login. Chargebacks are a permanent ban.

The live path deserves its own warning label. On E2L the first CASH payout and the LIVE conversion are one event: hit the target, click Switch to Live, the bonus pays and the account converts, so the fast path is mandatory if you want the bonus. What converts is smaller than what you left: max contracts drop versus the funded sim stage, and the entire LIVE risk budget equals your accumulated LIVE credit, which after a single 25K conversion is 500 dollars. One LIVE account per trader, further conversions credit into it, and failing a LIVE account from E2L locks new E2L purchases for a month. Fundamental and Premium reach LIVE by discretion only, initiated by Phidias from 5 payouts or 100K in cumulative profits, and those thresholds were raised mid-stream from 3 payouts or 75K with the old values printed as deprecated, a goalpost move we log in the trust section. Staying sim carries no split penalty, which softens it, but a moved goalpost is a moved goalpost.

One dated dispute belongs here rather than buried in trust: a reviewer reports a Premium 50K force-liquidated on floating equity while the balance sat 2,500 above the floor, against the firm's own help-center article, a website spike-protection claim, and written pre-purchase support confirmation that open positions are excluded from the end-of-day check. It is single-source, the account number is cited, and until the firm clarifies enforcement in writing, assume the EOD check can bite an open position intraday and keep your stop where a liquidation can never reach it first.

New to any of these terms? Our plain-terms guides break down drawdown, consistency rules, and the rest.

What Has Changed at Phidias Propfirm

Rule Nuances on Record

MIN-DAYS CONFLICT, unresolved with the firm: the rules page now prints both sides of it. The General Rules block carries a blanket 'Min. Trading Days to Pass: 3 days' - it moved onto the public page in the 2026-07-25 rewrite; earlier the blanket line was portal-only - while the same page's family sections print zero minimum days on Express to Live and one on Premium, and a dated Trustpilot reviewer reports hitting target on day 2 of a zero-minimum account and being held to a 3-day gate anyway (review updated 2026-05-07). Until the firm confirms the enforced per-family values in writing, plan around the possibility that 3 days is the real gate everywhere. The same page also prints the session end two ways: 9:59 PM UTC in Trading Hours and 10:00 PM UTC+2 in the end-of-day section, which matches neither; we list the 9:59 PM UTC reading. AUTOMATION: bots, fully automated algos, and HFT banned at all stages; semi-automated software allowed only with active human monitoring and manual adjustment; third-party copy-trading software allowed at the trader's own risk within the same constraint. News trading allowed on all account types and stages.

Source - logged 2026-07-30

Payouts and Proof

Every dollar Phidias approves lands first in the Phidias Wallet, an internal closed-loop ledger, and the only door out of it is a Rise bank transfer, available any day of the week. Nothing deposits into the Wallet from outside, and the design would clearly rather you never withdraw either, because Wallet money can instantly buy new evals, pay activation fees, or fund your live account, a reinvestment loop that stands in for the bundle deals other firms sell. LIVE profits skip the Wallet and go straight to Rise. Keep in mind that Rise runs its own KYC and AML checks independent of Phidias, and the most prominent payout dispute in the current record turns exactly on that seam.

The splits are simple: 80/20 on Express to Live including its one-shot bonus, 80/20 fixed on Fundamental, and a progressive ladder on Premium that climbs 75, 80, 85, 90, and then 100 percent from the fifth payout onward. Cadence and caps do the real shaping. Fundamental pays every 10 distinct qualifying trading days and Premium every 5, a qualifying day meaning positive PnL of at least 150 to 250 dollars by size, with a balance threshold to clear and a per-cycle cap of 2,000 to 2,750 by size that stays in place until the discretionary LIVE transition. The minimum withdrawal is 500 dollars, and yes, one clause of the firm's legal terms says 1,000, but the rules page and the help center both say 500 and the governing surfaces agree, so 500 it is. E2L has no recurring funded payout at all: hit the CASH target once, the bonus fires, and you are live, where payouts turn daily and uncapped at the same 500 minimum. Stacking room is real, too: 15 funded accounts maximum, five per family with 150K accounts counting double in theirs, copying your own accounts allowed inside the caps, and the limits enforced per household, address, and internet connection.

Speed is the firm's favorite subject and the place where proof runs thinnest. Phidias claims 90 percent of payouts process in under 30 minutes and all inside 24 hours, and we carry that as a firm claim because that is all it currently is. The fast-payout lore that used to circulate in reviews predates Trustpilot's removal of reviews it identified as fake, and there is no way to tell which of those reports survived, so we lean on none of it. What survives is thinner but real: a dated two-day funded-to-payout report from May 2026, 24-hour processing reports, and payout confirmations sitting inside otherwise critical reviews, which are the most credible kind. Against that sits one prominent dated dispute, a 10,000 dollar payout approved, credited to the Wallet, used in the firm's own leaderboard marketing, and reported never received, with the firm publicly attributing it to Rise-side KYC and a bank rejection and promising automatic reissue on clearance. Both sides are dated; neither is verified. So the tier assignment writes itself: reported and unverified, with the dated evidence list below as the whole case file. The rating returned in August 2026 at 3.4 and became unavailable again in early September, and the tier stays where it is until independent payout proof shows up.

Trust Profile

The third-party rating for Phidias has been unavailable twice this year, and the dates are the trust profile. In the summer, Trustpilot removed reviews it identified as fake and marked the rating unavailable for a breach of its guidelines; that status held through both of our July checks, and on August 2, 2026 a recalculated 3.4 across 308 reviews was published, a below-average number for this roster and the first third-party input we could use since June. As of our September 8, 2026 check the rating is unavailable again. The profile displays a Warning label, states that the rating is unavailable due to a breach of Trustpilot's guidelines, and carries a notice that Trustpilot has removed a number of fake reviews for this company. We do not know what prompted the second review, and we have not seen a statement from the firm about it; if one is published we will carry it here. What we can say is that there is no third-party rating to read right now, and our scoring treats an unavailable rating as the lowest review input rather than reusing the number that used to display. On the firm's own pages, our late-July check found a self-claimed 4.6 on the homepage with testimonial cards showing Trustpilot 5.0 badges, a trader count that reads 50,000-plus on the homepage and 25,000-plus on the accounts, affiliate, and challenge pages, and zero-denied-payouts and 15-million-paid lines with no audit behind them. Those are the firm's claims, dated as we found them, and none of them is something we can verify.

Identity is partially verified, and we will tell you exactly how partially. The French RNE, an official registry, carries Phidias Propfirm Limited as a foreign commercial company with a registered office at Eurotowers in Gibraltar, which confirms the name, the address, and the jurisdiction from a source the firm does not control. The Gibraltar primary record, the company number and incorporation date, sits behind a paid wall with no free public search, so the firm's claim of three years operating stays firm-claimed, and leadership is not publicly disclosed. One more structural honesty point: the legally binding terms are authoritative only in French under Gibraltar law, so an English reader is reading a courtesy translation. We scanned the French version and it matches section for section, which is fair conduct, but the governing text is still not the one most buyers will read. On the CFTC and NFA question, split the company in two before you ask it: the eval side is simulated, so registration is not in play there, while the LIVE arm clears through Dorman Trading, a registered FCM, with accounts opened via Sweet Futures.

The conduct record is dated and two-sided, so here it is with dates. Phidias 2.0 relaunched the product on May 4, 2026, and the weeks after it produced a migration grievance cluster: a pre-2.0 purchaser stranded on old terms and told to repurchase, eval accounts deactivated without notice around a payment-vendor change, and card payments broken for about two weeks in June. The LIVE-transition goalposts moved against funded traders mid-stream, from 3 payouts or 75K to 5 payouts or 100K, with the old values printed as deprecated on the rules page. And a recurring pattern runs through the dated reviews, each report single-source but the pattern repeated: Discord bans and deleted messages after payout or liquidation disputes, one of which the firm publicly denies. On the other side of the ledger, the firm actively replies to negative reviews with detailed rebuttals, the same dated window carries praise for multi-platform support and swing reliability plus one review revised upward after the firm made it right, and the rulebook transparency is genuinely strong. Both sides stay on the record. The summer review ended with a recalculated rating built from the reviews Trustpilot kept, and that 3.4 displayed for about a month before the rating became unavailable a second time.

Trustpilot has this firm's rating hidden behind a guideline warning as of our 2026-09-15 check.

Compared With Other Firms

Phidias is one of the few firms on our futures roster whose payout proof we cannot rate above reported and unverified, and that placement, more than any single score, is what separates it from the firms it otherwise resembles. The shape of the scorecard is lopsided: the product axes hold up, with rare swing permissions, the shortest published live path we track, and honest one-page rules, while the trust axis carries an unavailable third-party rating, unverifiable claims, and a partially walled registry record. Firms above it on the roster pair similar product strengths with proof. We keep this section short on purpose and hand the cross-shopping to the head-to-head pages and the full roundup. The flat verdict: the product is real and readable, the proof is not there yet, and the smart move is to treat Phidias as unproven, and a third-party rating that is unavailable for the second time does not say otherwise.

This review covers one firm. When you want the wide view, the best futures prop firms rankings line the field up side by side.

Frequently Asked Questions

About the Author

Affiliate Disclosure

Still Funded scores every firm on the same data, and commission is not a field the scoring math can see. Still Funded has no affiliate relationship with Phidias Propfirm and earns nothing if you sign up. Phidias Propfirm is scored on the same published methodology as every other firm.

Read the full Affiliate Disclosure for how we handle partnerships and links site-wide.