Phidias Propfirm Review 2026
Phidias sells a product you can read and a reputation you cannot check. The rulebook is public, the swing permissions are rare, and the live path is short; the ratings, the payout totals, and the trader counts are all self-claimed, and Trustpilot suspended the score. Both halves are in here.
Last updated 2026-07-19
On this page
At a Glance: The Four Scores
Trust Score
Are they a real, accountable business, do they actually pay, and what does the track record show.
Cost Score
What it truly costs to get funded and stay funded, measured against standard pricing and the firm's typical sustained discount.
Payout Score
How much you can pull, how fast it lands, how often, and how many accounts you can stack.
Rules Score
How trader-friendly the rules are: drawdown type and spacing, daily loss limits, and consistency rules.
Still Funded has no affiliate relationship with Phidias Propfirm and earns nothing if you sign up. Phidias Propfirm is scored on the same published methodology as every other firm.
Scores recompute automatically whenever this firm's data changes.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- A genuine one-page public rulebook with per-family grids, published before you pay and recently maintained (modified 2026-06-30) - rare rules transparency in this niche
- Express to Live is the fastest published sim-to-live route on our roster: static drawdown that never trails, zero minimum trading days at every stage, no consistency rule, and the first funded payout converts the account straight to LIVE with a cash bonus and a LIVE credit in one event
- Premium is a true swing family, one of the few in futures prop: overnight and over-weekend holds, funded within one trading day of passing, a 5-day payout cadence, and a progressive split that reaches 100 percent from the fifth payout
- News trading allowed on every account type at every stage, no daily loss limits anywhere in the catalog, and no time limits
- Payouts move any day of the week through Rise, and LIVE accounts pay daily and uncapped at a 500 USD minimum
- The LIVE arm clears through Dorman Trading, a registered FCM, with accounts opened via partner Sweet Futures - a real brokerage endpoint, not a permanent sim
- The one-time payment path is effectively the standing sale: it carries the deeper published discount and zeroes the activation fee by construction, so nobody should ever pay list price - the live specifics stay on our Phidias discount page
Cons
- The Trustpilot rating is SUSPENDED after Trustpilot removed fake reviews - the sharpest trust flag on our roster - and there is currently no third-party rating at all, while the homepage still displays a self-claimed 4.6 and testimonial cards wearing 5.0 badges
- Marketing claims are unverifiable and internally inconsistent: 50,000-plus traders funded on the homepage against 25,000-plus on the firm's own accounts, affiliate, and challenge pages, plus zero-denied-payouts and 15M-paid claims with no audit or proof page
- The legally binding terms are authoritative only in FRENCH under Gibraltar law, and they contradict the newer rules page on several points; an English reader is reading a courtesy translation
- The static drawdowns are tight (500 USD on the 25K Express to Live, 2 percent of the label; 1,000 USD on the 150K), and a dated review disputes how the end-of-day drawdown was enforced against the firm's own published mechanics
- Funded CASH accounts on Fundamental and Premium carry a strict 30 percent consistency payout gate and per-cycle caps that last until a discretionary LIVE transition whose eligibility thresholds were RAISED mid-stream from 3 payouts or 75K to 5 payouts or 100K, with the old values printed as deprecated
- The E2L LIVE conversion is a risk squeeze: max contracts drop versus the funded sim stage, the entire LIVE risk budget equals the accumulated credit (500 USD after a single 25K conversion), and the bonus and the conversion are one event, so the fast path is mandatory if you want the bonus
- A recurring dated pattern of Discord bans and deleted messages after payout or liquidation disputes, alongside recent reports of email-only support with slow or absent responses
- Identity is only partially verified (the Gibraltar primary registry record sits behind a paid wall; the French RNE secondary registration supplies the name and address), and the payout proof goes no higher than our weaker reported/unverified tier
Strategic Edge Plays
- Swing traders: Premium is one of the only futures eval families anywhere that allows both overnight and over-weekend holds, and its split climbs to 100 percent - if you hold runners, this family is the reason Phidias is on your list at all
- Speed-to-live seekers: E2L's zero-min-days static design plus the automatic Switch to Live makes it the shortest published route to a real brokerage account on the roster - just size your expectations to the LIVE credit, because that credit IS your entire live risk budget
- Pay-path buyers: the one-time payment path zeroes the activation fee by construction and usually carries the deeper published cut, so decide your path before you shop codes - the path decision and the discount decision are the same decision, and the live details are on our Phidias discount page
- Eyes-open buyers only: while the Trustpilot suspension stands, every trust claim rests on the firm's own word - if third-party validation matters to you, wait for the post-purge recalculated rating before you buy
Verdict and Who It Is For
Phidias prints a 4.6 rating on its own homepage, complete with testimonial cards wearing Trustpilot 5.0 badges. Trustpilot itself currently shows no rating for Phidias at all, because Trustpilot removed a batch of fake reviews and suspended the score. That gap between what the firm says about itself and what you can actually verify is this whole review in miniature, because Phidias is really two firms depending on which side of that line you stand on.
On the checkable side, the product is genuinely good and unusually easy to read. The rules live on a real one-page public rulebook with per-family grids, published before you pay and kept current. Express to Live is the fastest published route from an evaluation to a live brokerage account we track: a static drawdown that never trails, zero minimum trading days at any stage, no consistency rule, and a first funded payout that converts the account straight to live money clearing through Dorman Trading, a registered FCM. Premium is a true swing family with overnight and weekend holds, which barely exists anywhere else on this roster. News trading is allowed everywhere, no account carries a daily loss limit, and there are no time limits.
On the unverifiable side sits everything the firm claims about itself: the zero-denied-payouts line, the 15 million paid, a funded-trader count that reads 50,000-plus on one of its own pages and 25,000-plus on another. None of it has a proof page behind it, and the one independent scoreboard that could have carried some of the weight is suspended for fake reviews. That is why Phidias holds our reported and unverified payout-proof tier rather than the stronger community-aggregated one, and why the trust axis drags the scorecard above while the rules and product side holds it up.
Two profiles get the most out of Phidias. The swing trader, first and clearly, because Premium is one of the only places on our futures roster where holding overnight and through the weekend is simply allowed, with a split that climbs to 100 percent. Second, the disciplined trader who wants a real live account fast and can operate inside a tight static floor, because nothing else on our roster publishes a shorter sim-to-live path than E2L. It is the wrong firm for anyone who needs third-party validation before sending money, because right now there is none and the honest move is to say so. It is the wrong firm for anyone who averages down or trades loose stops, because the static floors are tight and the funded consistency gate on Fundamental and Premium will hold your payout. And it is the wrong firm for anyone reading the fast live path as free money, because the LIVE account you convert into carries a risk budget equal to your accumulated credit and nothing more.
Pricing and Account Tiers
Phidias sorts its whole catalog by how long you plan to hold, and that is the right first question to answer before you look at a single price. Express to Live is the intraday family for precise risk: static drawdown, four sizes from 25K to 150K, flat before the session close. Fundamental is intraday with an end-of-day trailing drawdown across 50K, 100K, and 150K, and it carries the strictest entry gate at three minimum trading days. Premium is the swing family, the rebuilt version of the old Swing accounts: the same three sizes, end-of-day trailing, a one-day eval minimum, and the only place in the catalog where overnight and over-weekend holds are allowed. Ten tiers total, every one of them a single-phase evaluation, plus a separate 10K Drawdown Challenge card that is a competition product rather than an eval, so we exclude it from the Cost Score inputs.
Every family sells on two pay paths, and the difference is structural. The Evaluation or monthly path carries a lower upfront fee plus a one-time Lifetime activation fee when you pass, 83 dollars on the 25K and 149 to 169 above it. The One-Time Payment path is a single payment with the activation fee at zero by construction. Express to Live is one-time only either way and sells no resets at all, so a failed E2L eval means buying a new account. Fundamental and Premium monthly subscriptions bill until you cancel, include a 30-day automatic reset after a failed eval, and sell paid resets at 40, 64, and 104 dollars by size. Premium adds one item nobody else has: a funded-stage Cash Account Reset at 399 to 599 by size, one per account, and you have 24 hours from liquidation to buy it or the account is gone.
Two more line items before checkout. CME top-of-book data is free on the eval, but market depth is a paid add-on per exchange, and prices are quoted ex-VAT, so EU buyers see tax added at the pay step that the marketing pages never mention. You also pick your platform on the same configurator: Rithmic, Tradovate, or DeepCharts as of our July 7 walk, with TradingView and NinjaTrader routing through Tradovate. The standard undiscounted figures are all in the table below. One reading note: the size on the label is simulated buying power, not a measure of what your fee buys.
| Account | Family | Variant | Eval fee | Activation | Target | Max drawdown | Contracts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $25,000 | Express to Live | Standard | $88 | $83 | $1,500 | $500 | 2 |
| $50,000 | Express to Live | Standard | $278 | $149 | $2,500 | $650 | 5 |
| $100,000 | Express to Live | Standard | $318 | $149 | $3,500 | $800 | 7 |
| $150,000 | Express to Live | Standard | $398 | $169 | $4,500 | $1,000 | 9 |
| $50,000 | Fundamental | Standard | $164 | $149 | $4,000 | $2,500 | 10 |
| $100,000 | Fundamental | Standard | $273 | $149 | $6,000 | $3,000 | 14 |
| $150,000 | Fundamental | Standard | $420 | $169 | $9,000 | $4,500 | 17 |
| $50,000 | Premium | Standard | $329 | $149 | $4,000 | $2,500 | 10 |
| $100,000 | Premium | Standard | $411 | $149 | $6,000 | $3,000 | 14 |
| $150,000 | Premium | Standard | $570 | $169 | $9,000 | $4,500 | 17 |
| $25,000 | Express to Live | One-time payment | $277 | Included | $1,500 | $500 | 2 |
| $50,000 | Express to Live | One-time payment | $723 | Included | $2,500 | $650 | 5 |
| $100,000 | Express to Live | One-time payment | $900 | Included | $3,500 | $800 | 7 |
| $150,000 | Express to Live | One-time payment | $1,125 | Included | $4,500 | $1,000 | 9 |
| $50,000 | Fundamental | One-time payment | $580 | Included | $4,000 | $2,500 | 10 |
| $100,000 | Fundamental | One-time payment | $723 | Included | $6,000 | $3,000 | 14 |
| $150,000 | Fundamental | One-time payment | $863 | Included | $9,000 | $4,500 | 17 |
| $50,000 | Premium | One-time payment | $723 | Included | $4,000 | $2,500 | 10 |
| $100,000 | Premium | One-time payment | $900 | Included | $6,000 | $3,000 | 14 |
| $150,000 | Premium | One-time payment | $1,123 | Included | $9,000 | $4,500 | 17 |
Cost in Practice and Live Discounts
Which pay path you buy on moves your real cost at Phidias more than any code ever will. The One-Time Payment path carries the deeper published discount and zeroes the activation fee by construction, while the Evaluation and monthly paths take a shallower cut and still owe activation at passing, so the one-time path is the default rational purchase for most buyers here. On top of that split sits a code layer that churns faster than any firm we track: the pre-applied code chip on the configurator rotated between our two checkout walks four days apart, and it had already rotated once within a single day before that. The firm runs an evergreen giveaway popup that hands a code to every email it captures, prints another code on its own homepage card, and as of early July its own free-account page still carried a superseded code from a prior cycle. A dated June review even alleges the discounted price is simply the normal price, and the always-on structure supports reading it that way, so treat the list prices in the table above as nominal. So the Cost Score here is figured from the level Phidias actually sustains rather than the sticker. The live code, the current depth by path, and the timing all live on our Phidias discount page, and make sure you check it before you pick a path, because the path decision and the discount decision are the same decision.
Rules and Risk Mechanics
Five hundred dollars. That is the entire drawdown under the 25K Express to Live account, 2 percent of the label, and it is static, so it never moves: start at 25,000, liquidate at 24,500, eval and funded alike. The 150K version gives you 1,000 of room, two-thirds of one percent. That is the trade E2L offers, a floor that never chases your equity higher in exchange for a floor that starts painfully close, and it is why this family rewards tight, planned risk and punishes anyone who averages down. Fundamental and Premium run an end-of-day trailing drawdown instead, and as trailing goes it is the friendly kind: it only recalculates at the close, and once you are funded it stops trailing entirely at your starting balance plus 100, where it becomes a static floor for the life of the account. No account in the catalog carries a daily loss limit or a time limit.
Minimum days run per family, zero on E2L, one on Premium, three on Fundamental, with one honest caveat: the member portal reportedly prints a blanket three-day minimum, and a dated reviewer reports hitting target on day two of a zero-minimum account and being held to a three-day gate anyway. Until Phidias confirms the enforced values in writing, plan around the possibility that three days is the real gate everywhere. There is no consistency rule on any evaluation. Funded CASH accounts on Fundamental and Premium carry a 30 percent rule calculated over a minimum of four days, and it is a payout gate, not a breach: an oversized day just means growing your total profit until the ratio complies. E2L skips consistency at every stage.
The conduct rules are where Phidias shows its teeth, so read them before you size up. Bots, fully automated algos, and HFT are banned at every stage; semi-automated software is allowed only with a human actively monitoring and adjusting. News trading is allowed everywhere, which is genuinely permissive, but the firm's Foreword reserves the right to strip positions or close accounts over gambling-style behavior like full-margin news punts and one-shot withdrawal plays. Cross-account hedging is the rule with the sharpest edge: long in one account and short in another on the same asset, alone or coordinated with another trader, means closure and confiscation for BOTH parties plus a site ban. You must trade the front month, calendar spreads between maturities are banned, and one-tick Treasury-bond arbitrage is banned by name. Fundamental accounts must be flat by the session close on a published clock, Premium is exempt, and account limits are enforced per tax household, address, and internet connection, not per login. Chargebacks are a permanent ban.
The live path deserves its own warning label. On E2L the first CASH payout and the LIVE conversion are one event: hit the target, click Switch to Live, the bonus pays and the account converts, so the fast path is mandatory if you want the bonus. What converts is smaller than what you left: max contracts drop versus the funded sim stage, and the entire LIVE risk budget equals your accumulated LIVE credit, which after a single 25K conversion is 500 dollars. One LIVE account per trader, further conversions credit into it, and failing a LIVE account from E2L locks new E2L purchases for a month. Fundamental and Premium reach LIVE by discretion only, initiated by Phidias from 5 payouts or 100K in cumulative profits, and those thresholds were raised mid-stream from 3 payouts or 75K with the old values printed as deprecated, a goalpost move we log in the trust section. Staying sim carries no split penalty, which softens it, but a moved goalpost is a moved goalpost.
One dated dispute belongs here rather than buried in trust: a reviewer reports a Premium 50K force-liquidated on floating equity while the balance sat 2,500 above the floor, against the firm's own help-center article, a website spike-protection claim, and written pre-purchase support confirmation that open positions are excluded from the end-of-day check. It is single-source, the account number is cited, and until the firm clarifies enforcement in writing, assume the EOD check can bite an open position intraday and keep your stop where a liquidation can never reach it first.
New to any of these terms? Our plain-terms guides break down drawdown, consistency rules, and the rest.
How does the static drawdown on Express to Live work?
It never moves. The liquidation level is set at purchase, 500 below start on the 25K, 1,000 below on the 150K, and it stays there through the eval and the funded stage alike. Your equity can run as high as it wants and the floor does not chase it, which is the whole appeal, but the floor also starts close, so make sure your per-trade risk is sized to a 2 percent total cushion on the 25K before you buy.
Does Phidias have a consistency rule?
Not on any evaluation, and never on Express to Live. Funded CASH accounts on Fundamental and Premium carry a 30 percent rule calculated over a minimum of four days: no single day may exceed 30 percent of your total profit. Tripping it does not fail the account, it holds your payout until your other days catch up.
Can you hold trades overnight or over the weekend at Phidias?
Only on Premium, which allows both and is one of the few eval families we track that does. Fundamental must be flat by the session close on a published clock, and E2L must flat daily as well, with violations treated as disqualification.
Payouts and Proof
Every dollar Phidias approves lands first in the Phidias Wallet, an internal closed-loop ledger, and the only door out of it is a Rise bank transfer, available any day of the week. Nothing deposits into the Wallet from outside, and the design would clearly rather you never withdraw either, because Wallet money can instantly buy new evals, pay activation fees, or fund your live account, a reinvestment loop that stands in for the bundle deals other firms sell. LIVE profits skip the Wallet and go straight to Rise. Keep in mind that Rise runs its own KYC and AML checks independent of Phidias, and the most prominent payout dispute in the current record turns exactly on that seam.
The splits are simple: 80/20 on Express to Live including its one-shot bonus, 80/20 fixed on Fundamental, and a progressive ladder on Premium that climbs 75, 80, 85, 90, and then 100 percent from the fifth payout onward. Cadence and caps do the real shaping. Fundamental pays every 10 distinct qualifying trading days and Premium every 5, a qualifying day meaning positive PnL of at least 150 to 250 dollars by size, with a balance threshold to clear and a per-cycle cap of 2,000 to 2,750 by size that stays in place until the discretionary LIVE transition. The minimum withdrawal is 500 dollars, and yes, one clause of the firm's legal terms says 1,000, but the rules page and the help center both say 500 and the governing surfaces agree, so 500 it is. E2L has no recurring funded payout at all: hit the CASH target once, the bonus fires, and you are live, where payouts turn daily and uncapped at the same 500 minimum. Stacking room is real, too: 15 funded accounts maximum, five per family with 150K accounts counting double in theirs, copying your own accounts allowed inside the caps, and the limits enforced per household, address, and internet connection.
Speed is the firm's favorite subject and the place where proof runs thinnest. Phidias claims 90 percent of payouts process in under 30 minutes and all inside 24 hours, and we carry that as a firm claim because that is all it currently is. The fast-payout lore that used to circulate in reviews predates the fake-review purge, and the purge contaminated all of it, so we lean on none of it. What survives is thinner but real: a dated two-day funded-to-payout report from May 2026, 24-hour processing reports, and payout confirmations sitting inside otherwise critical reviews, which are the most credible kind. Against that sits one prominent dated dispute, a 10,000 dollar payout approved, credited to the Wallet, used in the firm's own leaderboard marketing, and reported never received, with the firm publicly attributing it to Rise-side KYC and a bank rejection and promising automatic reissue on clearance. Both sides are dated; neither is verified. So the tier assignment writes itself: reported and unverified, with the dated evidence list below as the whole case file, and we re-examine it when the Trustpilot suspension resolves.
Payout evidence
- firm claim2026-07-03Phidias claims on its homepage that it has paid more than 15 million USD, that every dollar is verified, that it has denied zero payouts in three years, and that its approval rate is 100 percent. We found no audit and no proof page behind any of it. With the firm's Trustpilot rating suspended, there is currently no independent surface to check those claims against.Source
- trustpilot2025-09-23A reviewer four months into trading with the firm reports more than 4,000 USD in total payouts, all landing in under 24 hours (2025-09-23). This is one of only four reviews still visible on the suspended profile.Source
- trustpilot2026-05-22A one-star review complaining about support nonetheless confirms the firm paid out, stating the reviewer received 2,000 USD from Phidias (2026-05-22). A payout confirmation buried inside an angry review is the most credible kind there is, because the reviewer has no reason to flatter the firm.Source
- trustpilot2026-05-08A five-star reviewer in France reports being funded and paid out within two days, crediting fast support (2026-05-08).Source
- trustpilot2026-06-02A one-star review about the payment-vendor change mentions in passing that the firm had sent the reviewer a payout before (2026-06-02). Another incidental confirmation from an unhappy customer.Source
- trustpilot2026-05-18The counter-evidence, and it is the single most important entry here. A trader in Germany reports a 10,000 USD payout that was approved, confirmed, credited to his Phidias Wallet, and then advertised under his own name in the firm's April top-five-payouts marketing, and that he never received the money (review updated 2026-05-18). He also reports being banned from Discord, having support messages deleted, and being locked out of his account after he escalated. Phidias replied publicly: it says the payment is blocked because Rise-side KYC did not validate and a bank rejected the incoming payment, that the account is on compliance hold, and that the payment reissues automatically once that clears. This is a single account and we cannot verify either version. Both sides are on the record, and this is the one to watch.Source
Does Phidias actually pay out?
The honest answer is that dated confirmations exist and independent proof does not, so the proof tier stays at reported and unverified. Payout confirmations sit inside otherwise critical recent reviews, the most credible kind, alongside one prominent dated dispute over a 10,000 dollar payout the firm attributes to Rise-side KYC. The firm's own headline claims, zero denials and 15 million paid, have no audit behind them, and the fake-review purge contaminated the older review-sourced evidence. We re-examine the tier when the Trustpilot suspension resolves.
How fast does Phidias pay?
The firm claims 90 percent of payouts process in under 30 minutes and everything inside 24 hours, and that is a marketing claim, not a verified number. Dated recent reports include two-day funded-to-payout and 24-hour processing. The rail is the Phidias Wallet to a Rise bank transfer, any day of the week, with a 500 dollar minimum, and keep in mind Rise runs its own KYC independent of the firm.
Trust Profile
There is no third-party rating to show you for Phidias right now, and that sentence is the trust profile. Trustpilot removed a number of fake reviews from the Phidias profile and suspended the rating for a guidelines breach, which is the worst signal a third-party review platform can send, and it was still standing at both of our July checks. We will not fabricate a substitute number. The firm has made a different choice: the homepage still displays a self-claimed 4.6 with testimonial cards wearing Trustpilot 5.0 badges that point at a profile currently showing nothing. Add a trader count that disagrees with itself across the firm's own pages, 50,000-plus funded on the homepage against 25,000-plus on the accounts, affiliate, and challenge pages, and the zero-denied-payouts and 15-million-paid lines with no audit behind them, and the pattern is plain: the claims run well ahead of anything checkable.
Identity is partially verified, and we will tell you exactly how partially. The French RNE, an official registry, carries Phidias Propfirm Limited as a foreign commercial company with a registered office at Eurotowers in Gibraltar, which confirms the name, the address, and the jurisdiction from a source the firm does not control. The Gibraltar primary record, the company number and incorporation date, sits behind a paid wall with no free public search, so the firm's claim of three years operating stays firm-claimed, and leadership is not publicly disclosed. One more structural honesty point: the legally binding terms are authoritative only in French under Gibraltar law, so an English reader is reading a courtesy translation. We scanned the French version and it matches section for section, which is fair conduct, but the governing text is still not the one most buyers will read. On the CFTC and NFA question, split the company in two before you ask it: the eval side is simulated, so registration is not in play there, while the LIVE arm clears through Dorman Trading, a registered FCM, with accounts opened via Sweet Futures.
The conduct record is dated and two-sided, so here it is with dates. Phidias 2.0 relaunched the product on May 4, 2026, and the weeks after it produced a migration grievance cluster: a pre-2.0 purchaser stranded on old terms and told to repurchase, eval accounts deactivated without notice around a payment-vendor change, and card payments broken for about two weeks in June. The LIVE-transition goalposts moved against funded traders mid-stream, from 3 payouts or 75K to 5 payouts or 100K, with the old values printed as deprecated on the rules page. And a recurring pattern runs through the dated reviews, each report single-source but the pattern repeated: Discord bans and deleted messages after payout or liquidation disputes, one of which the firm publicly denies. On the other side of the ledger, the firm actively replies to negative reviews with detailed rebuttals, the same dated window carries praise for multi-platform support and swing reliability plus one review revised upward after the firm made it right, and the rulebook transparency is genuinely better than most of this roster. Both sides stay on the record. The suspension itself gets a recheck on a short cycle, because suspensions can end with a recalculated rating from the surviving reviews, and whatever that number turns out to be is the first third-party trust input this firm will have had since June.
Stability flags and Trustpilot detail
- review manipulation
Trustpilot removed fake reviews from this firm's profile and then suspended its rating for breaking Trustpilot's business guidelines. The profile was still suspended when we last checked it on 2026-07-07, which means there is no third-party rating to show and none feeds our Trust Score. A suspension can end with a recalculated rating built from whatever reviews survive, so this can change.
Source - sudden term change2026-06-30
Phidias raised the bar for moving to a live account. It went from 3 payouts and 75,000 USD to 5 payouts and 100,000 USD, and the rules page still prints the old numbers as retired. The rules page was last modified 2026-06-30, so the change landed on or before that date. Traders already working toward the old target had the goalposts moved on them.
Source - product relaunch2026-05-04
Phidias 2.0 went live on 2026-05-04. It brought a new account structure (E2L, Fundamental, and Premium), returned Tradovate, TradingView, and NinjaTrader to the platform list, and reworked the path to a live account. Premium is the old Swing family rebuilt.
Source - relaunch migration grievances2026-05
Traders who bought before the 2.0 relaunch reported problems getting moved over. One says he was left on the old terms and told to buy again to get Premium and TradingView access, with activation-fee friction on top (2026-05-07). Around a payment-vendor change, another says evaluation accounts were switched off with no warning (2026-06-02), and a third says card payments were broken for about two weeks (2026-06-03).
Source - reckless comms2026-04-01
On 2026-04-01 the firm published an announcement saying all payouts were suspended, then followed it with a clarification that it was an April Fools joke and that no payouts were suspended. This comes from a third-party firm tracker (linked), and we have not confirmed it against the firm's own announcements. Joking about freezing payouts is a strange choice at a business where payout confidence is the whole product.
Source - dispute suppression reports2026-05
Several traders say they were banned from the firm's Discord, or had messages deleted, after raising payout or liquidation disputes (reviews dated 2026-05-06, 2026-05-18, 2026-05-19, and 2026-06-03, the last of which says others were removed for asking questions). Each is a single account and none is verified on its own. Phidias publicly disputes at least one of them. We log the pattern, not a conclusion.
Source - platform outage2026-05-31
A trader reports that a Tradovate data-feed failure on 2026-05-31 turned a winning position into a 20,000 USD loss, and that Phidias did not make the account whole afterward, while two other firms corrected the accounts their traders lost on the same feed (review dated 2026-06-04). This is a single account and we could not independently verify it, but it is dated, it names the platform, and the firm's handling of it is the part worth watching.
Source
Stability last reviewed 2026-07-07. Full monitoring on the Stability Tracker.
Is Phidias Propfirm legit?
Partially verifiable, and the parts you cannot verify are the problem. The entity is real, confirmed on the official French registry with a Gibraltar registered office, and the LIVE arm clears through a registered FCM. But the Trustpilot rating is suspended for fake reviews, the marketing claims have no proof behind them, and the Gibraltar primary record sits behind a paid wall. Legit in the sense of a real company selling a real product, yes. Proven, not yet.
Why does Phidias have no Trustpilot rating right now?
Trustpilot removed a number of fake reviews for the company and suspended the rating for a breach of its business guidelines. While the suspension stands, no rating or review count displays at all. Suspensions can end with a recalculated rating built from the surviving reviews, and that recalculated number will be the first usable third-party trust input for this firm.
Compared With Other Firms
Phidias is one of the few firms on our futures roster whose payout proof we cannot rate above reported and unverified, and that placement, more than any single score, is what separates it from the firms it otherwise resembles. The shape of the scorecard is lopsided: the product axes hold up, with rare swing permissions, the shortest published live path we track, and honest one-page rules, while the trust axis carries a suspended rating, unverifiable claims, and a partially walled registry record. Firms above it on the roster pair similar product strengths with proof. We keep this section short on purpose and hand the cross-shopping to the head-to-head pages and the full roundup. The flat verdict: the product is real and readable, the proof is not there yet, and the smart move is to treat Phidias as unproven until the third-party record comes back and says otherwise.
This review covers one firm. When you want the wide view, the best futures prop firms rankings line the field up side by side.
Frequently Asked Questions
What platforms can you trade on at Phidias?
Rithmic, Tradovate, and DeepCharts were all selectable at our July 7 checkout walk, with Tradovate the default, and TradingView and NinjaTrader route through Tradovate rather than appearing as their own picker options. Worth knowing: four days earlier the picker offered Rithmic only, and dated reviews document the earlier gap between what the marketing advertised and what checkout sold, so verify your platform is selectable on the configurator before you pay.
Do US traders qualify for Phidias?
Yes. The US is not on the restricted list, US testimonials are featured, and CFTC disclaimers run on every page. The restricted list covers roughly 59 countries, including a handful of EU members, so check it before buying, and know that the payout rail applies its own KYC on top of whatever the firm asks for.
Affiliate Disclosure
Still Funded scores every firm on the same data, and commission is not a field the scoring math can see. Still Funded has no affiliate relationship with Phidias Propfirm and earns nothing if you sign up. Phidias Propfirm is scored on the same published methodology as every other firm.
Read the full Affiliate Disclosure for how we handle partnerships and links site-wide.