- Home
- Prop Firms with No Consistency Rule
Prop Firms with No Consistency Rule
Last updated 2026-10-27
This ranking rewards the most trader-friendly rules overall, and a section further down shows exactly which plans skip the consistency rule.
On This Page
You just printed your best day of the month on a funded account, and the firm's consistency rule says it doesn't count yet. That is the moment this rule was built for. A consistency rule caps how much of your profit can come from a single day. At some firms it is checked at the exact moment you request a payout, which means the rule taxes your best trading precisely when you try to collect on it.
Traders looking for prop firms with the least rules almost always mean this rule. So this page ranks all 15 ranked firms by our Rules Score, which measures how trader-friendly each firm's full set of rules is. Then it maps exactly where consistency rules do and do not apply, because the honest answer is more specific than firm names. The rule lives on plans, not firms.
Quick Picks by Use Case
There is more than one way to be free of the consistency rule. Pick the one that matches where the rule hurts you.
Clean Funded Side, No Payout WindowsTake Profit Trader
No consistency check on the funded account, no payout windows, zero minimum days.
Cleanest Both Sides on One PlanPhidias Express to Live
No consistency rule on the eval or the funded terms, and one of the lighter sets of rules among the firms we cover.
Best Plan Menu for Rule ShoppersMyFundedFutures
The plans differ enough that you can pick your rules off a shelf.
Strict Eval, Free FundedEarn2Trade
The strict rules sit in the eval, and the funded side runs without a consistency check.
Care more about the drawdown than the consistency rule? The static drawdown list covers the other rule traders shop for.
The Ranked List
Ties break on the overall score and then alphabetically, and the order is worked out again when a firm changes its rules. The section after the list maps the no-consistency plans one by one.
- #1
MyFundedFutures
69/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $105 to $477
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: Varies by plan
- 80% profit split
The choice of rules is the product here. The plans differ more inside this one firm than some firms differ from each other, with clean funded terms and no consistency check on most of the lineup and the strict rules concentrated on the Builder plan. If you shop by rules, this is the deepest shelf.
- #2
Take Profit Trader
76/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $150 to $360
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: On demand
- 80% profit split
No funded consistency check, no payout windows, zero minimum days. The rule that remains is the payout buffer: profit equal to the account's max drawdown has to be built before standard withdrawals open. The sharp edge here is the drawdown, which trails your peak balance during the day once you are funded, and the review goes over the complaints about it.
- #3
Tradeify
79/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $99 to $796
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: On demand
- 90% profit split
Rules that change by plan: one plan runs clean on the funded side while the others carry a consistency rule, so asking whether the firm has one has no single answer. Pick the plan, not the brand, and the funded terms table on the review shows which is which.
- #4
Earn2TradeSale
73/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- was
Evals from $150 to $550now Evals from $75 to $275 - Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: Weekly
- 80% profit split
Sale: 50% off evals and resets for the first 90 days (seen October 26, 2026).
The strict rules come first. The eval carries a daily limit that fails the account, contract limits enforced to the second, and a consistency requirement, and then the funded side runs clean, no consistency check standing between you and a request. It is a firm that tests you hard once instead of taxing you forever.
- was
- #5
TradeDay
72/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $100 to $500
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: On demand
- 50% profit split
Simple, published, and stable. The consistency requirement lives on the eval, and on Quick Pay the funded side runs clean, with on-demand payout access to match. Fast Pass carries a funded consistency rule. Nothing about these rules is trying to surprise you, which is its own kind of edge.
- #6
18th Street Trading
61/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $265 to $1,595
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: After a set number of days
- 90% profit split
Every phase carries a consistency rule on your best day, but it only delays a pass and never fails the account. The live account has none, and there is no daily loss limit in any of the four phases.
- #7
Lucid Trading
63/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $100 to $840
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: After a set number of days
- 90% profit split
Rule freedom varies by plan. LucidFlex runs without a funded consistency check, while a rule on how long you must hold a trade and the drawdown lock do the policing instead. That is the trade this firm offers: fewer rules on how you make your profit, more rules on how you place your trades.
- #8
Topstep
73/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $49 to $229
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: After a set number of days
- 90% profit split
A permissive reputation with a real consistency check at the funded stage, and the scaling rules doing most of the actual work. The rules are published, stable, and enforced as written, which counts for plenty even where they are not the loosest.
- #9
BluSky Trading
71/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $59 to $799
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing, Static
- How Often You Can Get Paid: Daily
- 90% profit split
Heavy on guidelines with one hard rule that fails the account, and more stages to get through than most firms, which means more sets of rules to read on the way. The Launch and Propel plans run without a funded consistency check, and the stage-by-stage terms are where the reading time goes.
- #10
Bulenox
69/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $145 to $535
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: Weekly
- 100% profit split
No consistency rule on the eval, then a strict check at every withdrawal request, which puts the weight of the rules at exactly the moment money moves. It is the clearest example among the firms we cover of why eval-side freedom tells you nothing about payday.
- #11
Phidias Propfirm
60/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $88 to $1,125
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Static
- How Often You Can Get Paid: After a set number of days
- 75% profit split
One of the lightest sets of rules among the firms we cover, including a plan with no consistency rule anywhere and a static account that is close to hit-target-get-paid. The drawdown limits are tight, which is the price of having so few rules, and that trade is the whole firm in one sentence.
- #12
Funded Futures Family
68/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $79 to $529
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: On demand
- 90% profit split
Two plans, Prime and Premier Plus, run clean on the eval side, and Premier Plus accounts bought before September 9, 2026 run clean on the funded side too; every newer account carries a funded check. The rule to actually understand here is the 10-second correction window, a firm-specific rule that gets misdescribed constantly. Read the firm's own version before sizing up.
- #13
Alpha Futures
72/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $89 to $859
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: On demand
- 90% profit split
The plan menu splits the rule burden cleanly. Zero strips the eval rule and carries a check on the funded side, Advanced runs the reverse, Standard carries a rule on both sides, and Direct has no eval at all, just the tightest funded consistency rule in the lineup. You choose whether you want the eval or the funded account clean. Few firms make the trade this explicit, which is genuinely useful.
- #14
Leeloo Trading
60/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $250 to $850
- Drawdown: Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: Monthly
- 100% profit split
Few written rules, and that is the problem, not the perk. Where the rules are silent, the firm's discretion fills the gap, and the review documents how that discretion has landed on traders' best days. The lesson of this firm is that a short set of rules is not a friendly one.
- #15
Apex Trader Funding
70/ 100TrustCostPayoutRules- Evals from $199 to $2,290
- Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
- How Often You Can Get Paid: Weekly
- 100% profit split
A clean eval with no consistency requirement, then a consistency check at the funded payout stage and a versioned set of rules that has changed materially over time.
No Consistency Plans by Firm
The consistency question splits in two. Eval-side consistency shapes how you are allowed to pass. Funded-side consistency shapes how you are allowed to get paid, and at several firms it is checked at the withdrawal request itself. The funded-side rule is the one that touches your money, so check that column first. The table below maps both sides for every plan at the firms we cover, straight from our firm data, and it updates when the firms change their terms.
| Firm | Plan | Eval Consistency Rule | Funded Consistency Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18th Street Trading | Funded Futures Plan | Yes | No |
| Alpha Futures | Zero | No | Yes |
| Advanced | Yes | No | |
| Direct | No | Yes | |
| Standard | Yes | Yes | |
| Apex Trader Funding | EOD | No | Yes |
| Intraday | No | Yes | |
| BluSky Trading | Launch | Yes | No |
| Propel | Yes | No | |
| Orbit | No | Yes | |
| Direct 2 Funded | No | Yes | |
| Instant Funded | No | Yes | |
| Stocks Intraday | Yes | Yes | |
| Bulenox | No Scaling | No | Yes |
| EOD | No | Yes | |
| Earn2Trade | Trader Career Path | Yes | No |
| Gauntlet Mini | Yes | No | |
| Funded Futures Family | Prime | No | Yes |
| Premier Plus | No | Yes | |
| Velocity | Yes | Yes | |
| S2F | Not published | Yes | |
| Leeloo Trading | Foundation | Yes | Yes |
| Lucid Trading | LucidFlex | Yes | No |
| LucidPro | Yes | Yes | |
| LucidDirect | No | Yes | |
| MyFundedFutures | Rapid | Yes | No |
| Rapid EOD | Yes | No | |
| Pro | Yes | No | |
| Builder | No | Yes | |
| Phidias Propfirm | Express to Live | No | No |
| Fundamental | No | Yes | |
| Premium | No | Yes | |
| Take Profit Trader | Test | Yes | No |
| Topstep | Trading Combine | Yes | Yes |
| TradeDay | Quick Pay | Yes | No |
| Fast Pass | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeify | Growth | No | Yes |
| Select | Yes | No | |
| Lightning | No | Yes |
A few patterns worth naming from the current data. The genuinely clean funded plans, no consistency check at all after funding, exist at 18th Street Trading, Earn2Trade, and Take Profit Trader, and on some plans at Alpha Futures, BluSky Trading, Lucid Trading, MyFundedFutures, Phidias Propfirm, TradeDay, and Tradeify. The clean eval plans, no consistency requirement while you pass, run at Apex Trader Funding, Bulenox, and Phidias Propfirm, and on some plans at Alpha Futures, BluSky Trading, Funded Futures Family, Lucid Trading, MyFundedFutures, and Tradeify. Only 1 plan among the firms we cover is clean on both sides, and it tends to charge for it somewhere else in its rules, which is exactly why this page ranks all the rules instead of one rule.
How We Ranked These
The Rules Score reads all of a firm's rules the way a funded trader experiences them. It reads the drawdown method and how it works, daily loss limits and what happens when you hit one, and consistency rules on the eval and on the funded account. It also reads rules on how long you must hold a trade, conduct rules, contract limits, and how much of it is actually published versus left to the firm's discretion. Trader-friendly rules score up, firm-favored rules score down, and rules we cannot verify do not get the benefit of the doubt, per the published score method.
Commission has no path into the score, and no firm is ranked by relationship.
What to Look For
Read the funded rules, not the eval marketing. Firms advertise the eval because the eval is the product they sell you, and the funded terms are the contract you actually have to abide by. A consistency rule that appears only after funding is in the funded terms, not on the sales page, and the check at withdrawal time is the version that costs real money. Make sure you know whether each rule you care about applies to the eval or to the funded account.
What the Rule Is For
Understand what the rule is for, because that tells you who it hurts. Firms run consistency rules to filter out lottery-ticket trading, one huge day on max size proves much less than twenty steady ones, and that is a defensible goal. The problem is how the rule is enforced. A rule checked over the life of the account is a filter. A rule checked at every payout request is a tax on your best days, and the difference between those two designs matters more than whether the rule exists at all.
Fewer Rules Is Not Less Risk
No rules doesn't mean no risk. The firms with the fewest rules tend to put their protection somewhere else. It shows up as tighter drawdown limits, rules on how long you must hold a trade, conduct rules with wide discretion, or account setups that cap how much you can take out. When the rules look too clean, find where the protection went, because it went somewhere. The reviews document exactly that for every firm on this page.
And a short set of rules cuts both ways. Published rules constrain the firm as much as the trader, since a firm that wrote the rule down has to enforce the rule it wrote. Where the rules are silent, discretion decides, and discretion has a track record you can read in each firm's payout evidence. Given the choice between a firm with one annoying published rule and a firm with no written rules and a denial history, take the annoying rule every time.
Read the Funded Terms First
So before you pay for any eval on this page, open the firm's funded terms and read them start to finish, the consistency rule, what ends the account, the withdrawal conditions, all of it. The eval rules are the test. The funded rules are the job. Buy the job.
FAQ
Is there any prop firm with no consistency rule?
Yes, several, with the important detail being whether it is the eval or the funded account that is clean. 18th Street Trading, Earn2Trade, and Take Profit Trader run funded accounts with no consistency check, and some plans at Alpha Futures, BluSky Trading, Lucid Trading, MyFundedFutures, Phidias Propfirm, TradeDay, and Tradeify do the same. The table above maps every plan from live data.
Which prop firm has less rules?
Fewest written rules is not the same as most trader-friendly rules, which is why this page ranks by the Rules Score instead of counting. The firms at the top of the list combine light rules on how you make your profit with published, stable terms. The firms with the fewest written rules sometimes rank lower, because unwritten rules get enforced by discretion, and that history shows up in the evidence.
What prop firm has the easiest payout rules?
Take Profit Trader runs a funded side with no consistency check, no minimum days, and no payout windows, though its payout buffer has to be filled before withdrawals open. TradeDay's Quick Pay skips even the payout buffer and needs only a positive balance. Easy payout rules and fast payout processing are different questions, and the fastest payout ranking covers the second one.
Do futures prop firms have consistency rules on funded accounts?
Many do, and the funded-side rule is the one that matters, because at several firms it is checked when you request a withdrawal, meaning an outsized winning day can delay your payout until the rest of your trading catches up. Some firms run the opposite design, a consistency requirement on the eval and a clean funded side. The table above shows which design each plan runs.
What is a consistency rule at a prop firm?
A consistency rule caps how much of your total profit can come from your single best day, expressed as a percentage of the whole. Firms use it to filter out one-lucky-day passes and oversized gambling on funded accounts. The details, the percentages, and when the rule is checked differ by firm and by plan, and each firm's review covers its exact version.