Get Notified About Prop Firm Sales >

Best Futures Prop Firms

Last updated 2026-07-16

The order on this page is computed, not chosen. Every firm below is scored on the same four dimensions, Trust, Cost, Payout, and Rules, using our published scoring method, and the list sorts itself from those scores every time the underlying data changes. Commission has no path into the math, so whichever firm sits at the top earned that spot in the data, not in a negotiation with us. That matters in this niche, because most best-of lists you will find are ordered by whoever pays the site the most, and the firm that pays a review site the most is rarely the firm that pays its traders the best.

One more thing before the list. There is no single best futures prop firm, and anyone telling you otherwise is selling you something. The best firm for a scalper pulling profit off daily is the wrong firm for a swing trader who holds through the close. So use the quick picks below to jump to the firm that fits your situation, and read the full ranking when you want the complete picture. Every score links back to how we calculate it.

Quick Picks By Use Case

If you already know what you need a firm to do, start here. Each pick names the firm whose data profile fits that job best right now, with the one-line reason why.

  • Best OverallTradeify

    The strongest combined score profile on the roster, carried by top-of-list Trust and Cost marks and on-demand payouts. If you want one safe default answer, this is it.

  • Fastest PayoutsTake Profit Trader

    The highest Payout score on the list. On-demand withdrawals from day one of the funded account and no funded consistency rule, so nothing forces your profit to sit under the firm's rules longer than you want it to.

  • Best Budget PickFunded Futures Family

    Near the top of the roster on Cost with a cleaner trust record than the other cheap seats. Just pick your plan family carefully, because the cheapest one carries the harshest mechanics.

  • Best For BeginnersEarn2Trade

    Built around education first, funding second, with one of the strongest Trust scores on the list. No minimum trading days and no time limit means you learn at your own pace instead of the calendar's.

  • Best For ScalingApex Trader Funding

    Up to 20 simultaneous funded accounts with permission to copy your own trades across them. If you have one proven strategy and want to multiply it, nothing else on the roster offers this much width.

  • Least Restrictive RulesMyFundedFutures

    The highest Rules score on the roster. Pick your plan by its funded-side rulebook, not its eval price, because that is where the four plan families actually differ.

The Ranked List

The full ranking, sorted by composite score. Ties break alphabetically by firm name, and we say so because a ranking you cannot audit is just a sales page with numbers on it. Each entry tells you why the firm scores the way it does and who it actually fits.

  1. #1

    Tradeify

    77/ 100
    Trust
    4.3
    Cost
    4.2
    Payout
    3.2
    Rules
    3.6
    • Evals from $99 to $796
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
    • Payout cadence: On demand
    • 90 percent split

    Tradeify's profile is strong where most firms are weak, at the trust and cost layers, and its funded side pays on demand. The Select plans are the detail worth knowing: they trade a slightly higher entry cost for a funded account with no consistency rule at all, which is worth real money to traders whose profit comes in uneven bursts. Make sure you run the payout-cap math on the Lightning accounts before you buy one, because each payout cycle resets your profit goal against a fixed per-payout cap.

    Read The Full Review
  2. #2

    Alpha Futures

    73/ 100
    Trust
    3.5
    Cost
    4.0
    Payout
    3.9
    Rules
    3.1
    • Evals from $79 to $859
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
    • Payout cadence: On demand
    • 90 percent split

    Alpha's Payout score is one of the best on the list, and the plan menu now runs the whole spectrum: Zero is the fast eval, no consistency rule, free activation, and a one-day pass is possible if your day goes right; Advanced trades that speed for withdrawal headroom with a flat five-figure per-request cap; and Direct skips the evaluation entirely for a one-time fee. Three genuinely different products, so buy the one that matches your goal, not the cheaper checkout.

    Read The Full Review
  3. #3

    Topstep

    73/ 100
    Trust
    3.6
    Cost
    3.5
    Payout
    3.8
    Rules
    3.5
    • Evals from $49 to $229
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
    • Payout cadence: Cycle-based
    • 90 percent split

    Topstep is the steady one. No axis of its score profile drops off a cliff, it has been funding futures traders longer than almost anyone in the space, and the built-in trade copier lets one strategy run across up to five funded accounts with combined buying power in the six figures. Traders who bank wins most days they trade should look at the consistency payout path, which opens up faster withdrawals for exactly that style.

    Read The Full Review
  4. #4

    Take Profit Trader

    72/ 100
    Trust
    3.8
    Cost
    3.1
    Payout
    4.2
    Rules
    3.4
    • Evals from $150 to $360
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: On demand
    • 80 percent split

    Take Profit Trader is built for getting paid, with the strongest Payout score on the list, on-demand withdrawals from day one, and no funded consistency rule. The catch is the drawdown switch: the eval forgives intraday swings with end-of-day drawdown, and the funded account does not. So trade your eval like it is already the funded account, and know your buffer number before your first withdrawal request.

    Read The Full Review
  5. #5

    Earn2Trade

    71/ 100
    Trust
    4.3
    Cost
    3.5
    Payout
    2.8
    Rules
    3.6
    • Evals from $150 to $550
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
    • Payout cadence: Weekly
    • 80 percent split

    Earn2Trade scores near the top of the roster on Trust, and it earns that the old-fashioned way, by teaching. The evals carry no minimum trading days and no time limit, so the consistency math sets your pace instead of a countdown clock. The thing to plan around is the flat rail fee on every single withdrawal: pulling small amounts weekly burns your split, so batch your withdrawals and keep more of your own money.

    Read The Full Review
  6. #6

    MyFundedFutures

    70/ 100
    Trust
    3.4
    Cost
    3.6
    Payout
    3.1
    Rules
    3.9
    • Evals from $95 to $477
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: Varies by plan
    • 80 percent split

    MyFundedFutures posts the best Rules score on the roster, and the reason is choice: four plan families whose evals are nearly interchangeable but whose funded-side rulebooks are four genuinely different products. Builder is the fast pass, one minimum trading day and no eval consistency rule. Pick the family by the funded account you want to end up in, not the eval price you start with.

    Read The Full Review
  7. #7

    TradeDay

    70/ 100
    Trust
    3.6
    Cost
    3.8
    Payout
    3.4
    Rules
    3.2
    • Evals from $125 to $480
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: On demand
    • 50 percent split

    TradeDay's edge is that it makes you choose your speed honestly. The Quick Pay family gets you to money fast with day-one payouts, and the standard family trades that speed for looser mechanics. Map the profit threshold that gates full withdrawals before your first funded trade, because gross profit here means realized profit after commissions, and traders who learn that mid-payout learn it the expensive way.

    Read The Full Review
  8. #8

    Apex Trader Funding

    69/ 100
    Trust
    3.8
    Cost
    3.4
    Payout
    3.9
    Rules
    2.6
    • Evals from $199 to $2,290
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: Weekly
    • 100 percent split

    Apex is the scaling play. Up to 20 simultaneous funded accounts with permission to copy your own strategy across them is width nothing else here matches, and the 100 percent split on early profit reads great on the banner. The rulebook is where its score pays the price, so read the per-payout caps and the payout ladder before you build a plan around that split, because the ladder is the real number.

    Read The Full Review
  9. #9

    BluSky Trading

    69/ 100
    Trust
    3.3
    Cost
    3.7
    Payout
    3.4
    Rules
    3.5
    • Evals from $59 to $749
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Static
    • Payout cadence: Daily
    • 90 percent split

    BluSky runs a daily payout cadence and a genuine path to a live brokerage account, which most sim-funded firms never offer. The mechanic to calendar is the live transfer: the invitation window opens when you cross the profit line and it forfeits what you leave behind, so withdraw as you go and put the transfer date on your calendar the day you qualify. Three simultaneous accounts each carry their own weekly cap, which roughly triples your withdrawal ceiling.

    Read The Full Review
  10. #10

    Funded Futures Family

    69/ 100
    Trust
    3.1
    Cost
    3.9
    Payout
    3.3
    Rules
    3.4
    • Evals from $79 to $734
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: On demand
    • 90 percent split

    Funded Futures Family is the budget pick that does not read like one, near the top of the roster on Cost with mechanics that are mostly fair. Mostly is the word to hear: Premier Plus is the only family here with no consistency rules at all, while Velocity is the cheap seat with the harshest mechanics on the page. Know your scaling ladder step before you size up, because the contract caps key off end-of-day realized profit.

    Read The Full Review
  11. #11

    Bulenox

    68/ 100
    Trust
    3.5
    Cost
    3.0
    Payout
    3.8
    Rules
    3.3
    • Evals from $145 to $535
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: Weekly
    • 100 percent split

    Bulenox's fee structure is built for small accounts, where activation costs about a month of subscription, and the value fades as the account sizes climb. Its two rule options are a real choice, full contracts from day one versus a friendlier drawdown, so pick the one that matches your style instead of the one that sounds nicer. Map the withdrawal requirements before you activate, because the trading-day minimums and safety thresholds stack up in front of your first payout.

    Read The Full Review
  12. #12

    Lucid Trading

    65/ 100
    Trust
    2.4
    Cost
    3.9
    Payout
    3.0
    Rules
    3.5
    • Evals from $100 to $840
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing
    • Payout cadence: Cycle-based
    • 90 percent split

    Lucid is the honest tension on this list: cost math near the top of the roster attached to one of the shortest operating histories on the page, and its Trust score carries that weight. LucidFlex is the shortlist pick for traders who hate daily loss limits, since it has none at any size. Automation and copiers are legal here, which is rare, but keep your profit mix clean because the detection rules are strict and enforced.

    Read The Full Review
  13. #13

    Leeloo Trading

    60/ 100
    Trust
    2.5
    Cost
    3.5
    Payout
    3.0
    Rules
    3.0
    • Evals from $250 to $850
    • Drawdown: Intraday trailing
    • Payout cadence: Monthly
    • 100 percent split

    Leeloo strips the eval down to almost no rules, no daily loss limit and no time limit anywhere on the ladder, and it is sim-only forever: it never forces a live conversion, which some traders count as a feature and others as a ceiling. The tradeoff is cadence and certainty: payouts run monthly through one narrow window, so price the gate into the subscription before you decide the math works.

    Read The Full Review
  14. #14

    Phidias Propfirm

    58/ 100
    Trust
    1.5
    Cost
    3.5
    Payout
    3.2
    Rules
    3.4
    • Evals from $88 to $1,125
    • Drawdown: End-of-day trailing, Static
    • Payout cadence: Cycle-based
    • 75 percent split

    Phidias carries the weakest verifiable trust record of any ranked firm, and its score says so plainly. It stays on this list because the product is genuinely unusual: the Premium evals allow both overnight and over-weekend holds, which almost nothing in futures funding permits, and the E2L path is one of the shortest published routes to a live account anywhere. Swing traders who need those permissions should read the full review and weigh the trust record with open eyes.

    Read The Full Review

How We Ranked These

Every firm on this page is scored on four dimensions, Trust, Cost, Payout, and Rules, from the same structured data, and the composite of those four sets the order. The scoring method is published in full, so you can check our math instead of taking our word: How We Calculate Scores.

Two commitments hold on every page of this site. First, commission never touches a score. The scoring engine is structurally walled off from every commercial field in our data, so a firm cannot buy a rank and we could not sell one if we wanted to. Second, the order recomputes from the data. When a firm changes its rules or its record changes, its scores move and the list re-sorts on its own. Nothing here is hand-placed, and when two firms tie on the composite, the tie breaks alphabetically by firm name.

If a firm's composite is ever withheld, it appears at the bottom of the page without a rank until its data can be verified. We would rather show you an honest gap than a made-up number.

What To Look For In A Futures Prop Firm

The ranking answers who scores best overall. This section is how you decide who fits you, because a funded account you cannot operate under is worth nothing at any price. Four things decide almost everything: the drawdown, the fees, the payout terms, and the rulebook.

The Drawdown Method Decides How You Can Trade

The drawdown is the single most important line in any prop firm's rules, and the type matters more than the number. An intraday trailing drawdown follows your open profit up in real time, so one sharp pullback on a winning trade can fail you while the trade is still green. An end-of-day drawdown only settles at the close, which forgives intraday swings. A static drawdown never moves at all. Make sure you know which type applies to the eval AND to the funded account, because several firms on this list switch types between the two, and traders who pass on end-of-day rules then blow the funded account on intraday trailing rules learn that lesson with real money on the line.Our guide on how prop firms work walks through each type.

Price The Whole Path, Not The Eval

The eval fee is the number firms advertise, and it is the smallest number in the deal. The real cost of getting funded is the eval plus the resets you will probably need, plus the activation fee when you pass, plus any monthly data or platform fees on the funded side. Two firms with the same sticker price can sit fifty points apart on our Cost score once the whole path is counted, and that is exactly what the score is for. So compare Cost scores, not checkout prices.

Payout Terms Are Where Funded Traders Get Surprised

Getting funded is the front half. Getting paid is the half that pays for everything, and it is where the fine print lives. Check the payout cadence, on demand, daily, weekly, or monthly, then check what stands in front of your first withdrawal: minimum trading days, profit buffers you must build before a dollar leaves, per-request caps, and consistency rules that gate the request itself. A 90 percent split you can rarely collect is worth less than an 80 percent split you can pull on demand. The Payout score weighs all of it, and the full review for each firm lists every gate by name.

The Rulebook You Can Live Under Beats The One That Scores Best

Consistency rules, daily loss limits, minimum trading days, news-trading bans, and overnight-hold rules are where firms quietly take back what the marketing gave. None of these rules is automatically bad, a daily loss limit can save an account from your worst day, but a rule that fights your actual style will bleed you. Swing traders need hold permissions. Scalpers need to check consistency math. Big-day traders need to know if one outsized win can void a payout. Read the Rules score as the summary and the review as the contract.

So the honest playbook is this: use the ranking to build a shortlist of two or three firms, then read those reviews against your own trading style, and pick the rulebook you can actually live under. Preserving your eval fee is just like preserving your capital, it is the discipline that keeps you in the game.

FAQ

What is the best futures prop firm?

The one whose funded-side rules fit how you trade, which is a real answer, not a dodge. Our ranking sorts every firm we track by a composite of Trust, Cost, Payout, and Rules scores, recomputed from the data as it changes, so the top of this page is the best overall profile right now. But a scalper and a swing trader should not buy the same account, so start from the quick picks above and match the firm to your style.

Which futures prop firm is the cheapest?

Cheapest depends on what you count. The lowest sticker price on this roster belongs to monthly-entry evals that cost less than a dinner out, but the real cost of funding is the eval plus resets plus activation plus funded-side fees. Our Cost score prices that whole path for every firm, so sort the list by Cost and read the top entries. The budget quick pick above is where we would start.

Which futures prop firm pays out the fastest?

On-demand firms pay fastest, and several on this list let funded traders request withdrawals from day one. Check two things before you buy for speed: the cadence, on demand beats daily beats weekly beats monthly, and the gates in front of the first payout, because minimum trading days and profit buffers can make a fast cadence slow in practice. The Payout score weighs both, and the fastest-payout quick pick above is the current leader.

What is the most popular futures prop firm?

By raw trader count and name recognition, the biggest names in futures funding are the firms with the largest review volumes on this list, and you can see each firm's third-party review count in its full review. Popular is not the same as good, though. Some of the most heavily marketed firms in this niche carry mid-table scores once you price their rules, which is exactly why we score four dimensions instead of counting ads.